Renegotiation-Proof Mechanism Design
نویسندگان
چکیده
A mechanism is said to be renegotiation-proof if it is robust against renegotiation both before and after it is played. We ask (1) what kind of environments admit the renegotiation-proof implementation of some social choice rules? (2) for a given environment, what kind of social choice rule are implementable in a way that is renegotiationproof? and (3) for a given renegotiation-proof implementable social choice rule, how can the rule be implemented in a way that is indeed renegotiation-proof? We obtain, for environments with private values, a tight characterization of renegotiation-proof mechanisms: for complete information environments, this characterization is in terms of ex-post efficient decision rules; for incomplete information environments with independent private values, this characterization is in terms of Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanisms. Importantly, we show that some common mechanism design problems do not admit the existence of any renegotiation-proof mechanism. J C : D02, D70, D82. K : ex-post renegotiation, interim renegotiation, oracle renegotiation proofness. ∗ Acknowledgements to be added. † Department of Economics, Boston University, 270 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215, and the Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel 69978; Email [email protected], http://people.bu.edu/zvika. ‡ Department of Economics, Boston University, 270 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215; Email [email protected], http://people.bu.edu/gpavlov.
منابع مشابه
Ex post renegotiation-proof mechanism design
We study what kind of equilibria of which mechanisms are ex post renegotiation-proof (EPRP), i.e., robust against the possibility of ex post renegotiation under a variety of renegotiation procedures, and which social choice functions are EPRP implementable. In complete information environments with two agents only budget balanced Groves allocations are EPRP implementable, while with three or mo...
متن کاملPosterior renegotiation-proofness in a two-person decision problem
When two agents with private information use a mechanism to determine an outcome, what happens when they cannot commit to their actions and to a mechanism? We study this problem by allowing agents to hold on to a proposed outcome in one mechanism while they play another mechanism and learn new information. A decision rule is posterior renegotiation-proof if it is posterior implementable and rob...
متن کاملThe Renegotiation-Proofness Principle and Costly Renegotiation
We study contracting and costly renegotiation in settings of complete, but unverifiable information, using the mechanism-design approach. We show how renegotiation activity is best modeled in the fundamentals of the mechanism-design framework, so that noncontractibility of renegotiation amounts to a constraint on the problem. We formalize and clarify the Renegotiation-Proofness Principle (RPP),...
متن کاملRenegotiation-Proof Contracts in Repeated Agency
Renegotiation-proof contracts are studied in infinitely repeated principalagent contracting. Contracts satisfying a weaker notion of renegotiationproofness always exist. With risk neutrality, efficient full-commitment contracts are renegotiation-proof if the agent’s expected lifetime utility is above a critical level; otherwise or if the agent is risk averse then efficient fullcommitment contra...
متن کاملRenegotiation-proof contract in repeated agency
Renegotiation-proof contracts are studied in infinitely repeated principal-agent problem. Contracts satisfying a weaker notion of renegotiation-proofness always exist. The renegotiation-proof value function has a simple characterization: It is the principal’s optimal value function when an appropriate lower bound is placed on the agent’s expected utility. Sufficient conditions are provided for ...
متن کامل